USA v. Timothy Sim
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| TIMOTHY THOMAS SIMS |
| 11-2331 |
| October 25, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111605970
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The judgment of the district court to exclude all evidence related to Sims's possession of child pornography is VACATED, and the case REMANDED for further proceedings. Decision for publication. Raymond M. Kethledge (AUTHORING) and Helene N. White (DISSENTING), Circuit Judges; and Thomas L. Ludington, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Timothy Sim | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Y. Mekaru |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: TIMOTHY THOMAS SIMS | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey J. O'Hara |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
