Robert Campbell v. USA
| ROBERT DAN CAMPBELL |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 11-3233 |
| March 4, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111374434
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment of the district court is VACATED and the case REMANDED for an evidentiary hearing to determine if Campbell directed his attorney to file a notice of appeal. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Eugene E. Siler, Jr. and Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges; Gregory F. Van Tatenhove, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Robert Campbell v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: ROBERT DAN CAMPBELL | |
| Represented By: | Robert Dan Campbell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Thomas A. Karol |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
