USA v. David Zobel
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
DAVID JEREMY ZOBEL |
11-3341 |
April 6, 2011 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6111461568 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The condition barring Zobel from viewing, listening to, or possessing anything that is "sexually suggestive" is VACATED, the case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings. The judgment of the district court in all other respects is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Karen Nelson Moore (DISSENTING), Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING), and Arthur L. Alarcon, Circuit Judges. The Honorable Arthur L. Alarcon, Senior Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. David Zobel | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Brent G. Tabacchi |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: DAVID JEREMY ZOBEL | |
Represented By: | Sandra J. Finucane |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.