USA v. Dennis Grigsby
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DENNIS M. GRIGSBY
Case Number: 11-3736
Filed: July 12, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 11, 2013 Summary United States v. Grigsby

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6111651478 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's order permitting involuntary medication is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. Decision for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt, David W. McKeague (DISSENTING), and Jane Branstetter Stranch (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Dennis Grigsby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: David Joseph Bosley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: DENNIS M. GRIGSBY
Represented By: Kevin Michael Schad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?