Robert James v. James Tunnell, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT N. JAMES
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES TUNNELL, Ohio DNR Officer and DARON RHOADS, Deputy
Case Number: 11-3890
Filed: August 18, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 10, 2012 Robert James v. James Tunnell

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Robert James v. James Tunnell, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: ROBERT N. JAMES
Represented By: Christopher James Pagan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: JAMES TUNNELL, Ohio DNR Officer
Represented By: Daniel Joseph Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: DARON RHOADS, Deputy
Represented By: Christopher W. Carrigg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?