USA v. Kenneth Cochrane
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| KENNETH KEVIN COCHRANE |
| 11-4081 |
| October 13, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111537960
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The Defendant's conviction is AFFIRMED, but his supervised release violation sentence is VACATED and REMANDED to the district court for resentencing. Decision for publication. Eric L. Clay (AUTHORING) and Jane Branstetter Stranch, Circuit Judges; and Robert Holmes Bell, U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation. [11-4081, 11-4082]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Kenneth Cochrane | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Dean M. Valore |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: KENNETH KEVIN COCHRANE | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth Kevin Cochrane |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
