Raymond Davis, Sr. v. City of Clarksville
| RAYMOND DAVIS, SR. |
| CITY OF CLARKSVILLE |
| 11-5040 |
| January 12, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Raymond Davis, Sr. v. City of Clarksville |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111368653
OPINION filed: The district court's grant of summary judgment is AFFIRMED. Decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Eugene E. Siler, Jr. and Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges; Gregory F. Van Tatenhove, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Raymond Davis, Sr. v. City of Clarksville | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: RAYMOND DAVIS, SR. | |
| Represented By: | Andy L. Allman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: CITY OF CLARKSVILLE | |
| Represented By: | William Timothy Harvey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
