Thomas Smith v. Jack Morgan
Petitioner - Appellee: THOMAS D. SMITH
Respondent - Appellant: JACK MORGAN
Case Number: 11-6517
Filed: December 22, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 27, 2012 Thomas Smith v. John Howerton

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6111541872 OPINION filed : we REVERSE the district court's issuance of a writ of habeas corpus as to Petitioner, decision not for publication. Damon J. Keith, Circuit Judge; Eric L. Clay, Authoring Circuit Judge and John M. Rogers, Circuit Judge.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Thomas Smith v. Jack Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellee: THOMAS D. SMITH
Represented By: Mariah A. Wooten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellant: JACK MORGAN
Represented By: Mark A. Fulks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?