Jarrett Hamilton v. GE
Plaintiff - Appellant: JARRETT HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Case Number: 11-6521
Filed: December 22, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 24, 2012 Jarrett Hamilton v. GE

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6111475388 Per Curiam OPINION filed : The district court's judgment is AFFIRMED, decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Boyce F. Martin , Jr., Circuit Judge; Helene N. White, Circuit Judge and Peter C. Economus, Senior District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jarrett Hamilton v. GE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: JARRETT HAMILTON
Represented By: Jarrett Hamilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Represented By: Edwin Sharp Hopson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?