Edward Carlton v. Jennifer Granholm, et al
| EDWARD NATHANIEL CARLTON |
| JENNIFER GRANHOLM, former Governor, FREDERIDCK PYTALL, Canton Township Police Department, BOOTH, Sergeant, Wayne County Sheriff Department, PATTON, Detective, Wayne County Sheriff Department, CYGAN, Sergeant, Ann Arbor Police Department, EHNIS, Ann Arbor Police Department, KETCHEM, Ann Arbor Police Department, JINKERSON, Sergeant, Ann Arbor Police Department, GIFFORD, Ann Arbor Police Department, KEMP, Ann Arbor Police Department, JERRY REYNARD, Detective, Ann Arbor Police Department, ROBERT WINTER, Detective, Ann Arbor Police Department, RONALD B. HIRSCHAL, M.D., University of Michigan Hospital, RAYMOND NEAL JOHNSON, Ann Arbor Police Department informer, SHERRY WEATHERSPOON, Washtenaw County prosecution witness, SAMUEL JOHNSON, Washtenaw County prosecution witness, KIRK K. NISSLEY, Assistant Prosecutor of Washtenaw County, DAVID KING, Assistant Prosecutor of Washtenaw County, BRIAN MACKIE, Washtenaw County Prosecutor, SUZANNE HOSETH KREEGER, Ionia County Judge, ARCHIE C. BROWN, Washtenaw County Judge, RICHARD A. BANDSTRA, Michigan Court of Appeals Judge, DAVID H. SAWYER, Michigan Court of Appeals Judge, JANE E. MARKEY, Michigan Court of Appeals Judge, JOHN DOE, Michigan Parole Board, MDOC Corrections Facility, MIKE COX, H. STEVEN LANGSCHWAGER, Assistant Attorney General, TONY TAGUE, Muskegon County Prosecutor, POLSIN, Inspector, Michigan State Police, SCHRAM, Lieutenant, Michigan State Police, BAKER, Lieutenant, Michigan State Police, HUNTER, Corrections Officer, MDOC, GREEG, Sergeant, MDOC, PLIKA, Lieutenant, MDOC, THRONE, MDOC, BRUCE EVANS, Inspector, MDOC, GRIDER, MDOC and RICK SMITH, MDOC Deputy Warden |
| 12-1041 |
| January 17, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
