GGNSC Springfield v. NLRB
| GGNSC SPRINGFIELD LLC, dba Golden Living Center-Springfield |
| NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD |
| 12-1529 |
| May 1, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111740488
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The petition for review is GRANTED, the National Labor Relations Board's order of April 9, 2012 is VACATED, and the Board's cross-application for enforcement is DENIED. Decision for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt (DISSENTING), Eric L. Clay, and Richard Allen Griffin (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges. [12-1529, 12-1628]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: GGNSC Springfield v. NLRB | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: GGNSC SPRINGFIELD LLC, dba Golden Living Center-Springfield | |
| Represented By: | Charles M. Roesch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD | |
| Represented By: | Linda Dreeben |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
