Guadalupe Garcia v. Matthew Thorne
Plaintiff - Appellant: GUADALUPE LINDA GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee: MATTHEW THORNE
Case Number: 12-1774
Filed: June 14, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 19, 2013 Guadalupe Garcia v. Matthew Thorne

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6111626245 OPINION filed : the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, decision not for publication. Boyce F. Martin , Jr., Authoring Circuit Judge; Ronald Lee Gilman, Circuit Judge and John Thomas Fowlkes , Jr., U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Tennessee, sitting by designation.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Guadalupe Garcia v. Matthew Thorne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: GUADALUPE LINDA GARCIA
Represented By: J. Nicholas Bostic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MATTHEW THORNE
Represented By: Patrick Arthur Aseltyne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?