Candido Romo v. Jeff Largen
Plaintiff - Appellee: CANDIDO ROMO
Defendant - Appellant: JEFF LARGEN
Case Number: 12-1870
Filed: July 3, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 23, 2013 Summary Romo v. Largen

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6111761418 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court's denial of qualified immunity with respect to Romo's fedearl malicious-prosecution claim is REVERSED, and the judgment of the district court is otherwise AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Ronald Lee Gilman, John M. Rogers (AUTHORING), and Jeffrey S. Sutton (CONCURRING IN PART AND IN THE JUDGMENT), Circuit Judges.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Candido Romo v. Jeff Largen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: CANDIDO ROMO
Represented By: William Frank Piper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: JEFF LARGEN
Represented By: Michael S. Bogren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?