Labeed Nouri v. Greg McQuiggin
Petitioner - Appellant: LABEED NOURI
Respondent - Appellee: GREG MCQUIGGIN
Case Number: 12-2008
Filed: August 8, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 18, 2013 Labeed Nouri v. Greg McQuiggin

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6111854539 Per Curiam OPINION filed : The district court's judgment is AFFIRMED, decision not for publication. Jeffrey S. Sutton, Circuit Judge; Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judge and Robert M. Dow , Jr., U.S. District Judge.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Labeed Nouri v. Greg McQuiggin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: LABEED NOURI
Represented By: Norton T. Gappy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: GREG MCQUIGGIN
Represented By: John S. Pallas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?