Sharee Miller v. Clarice Stovall
Petitioner - Appellant: SHAREE MILLER
Respondent - Appellee: CLARICE STOVALL
Case Number: 12-2171
Filed: September 13, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 11, 2014 Summary Miller v. Stovall

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 6111960748 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Dcision for publication. Danny J. Boggs (AUTHORING); Karen Nelson Moore (CONCURRING IN THE JUDGMENT), and Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judges.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sharee Miller v. Clarice Stovall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: SHAREE MILLER
Represented By: Kimberly Ann Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: CLARICE STOVALL
Represented By: Mark G. Sands
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?