USA v. Patrick Wiseman
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: PATRICK DALE WISEMAN
Case Number: 12-2309
Filed: October 10, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 21, 2013 USA v. Patrick Wiseman

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6111730615 Per Curiam OPINION filed: The District Court's judgment is AFFIRMED, decision not for publication. Danny J. Boggs and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judges; Frederick P. Stamp , Jr., United States District Judge for the Northern District of West Virginia, sitting by designation.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Patrick Wiseman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Daniel Y. Mekaru
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: PATRICK DALE WISEMAN
Represented By: Paul L. Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?