Dice Corp. v. Bold Technologie

Plaintiff - Appellant: DICE CORP.
Defendant - Appellee: BOLD TECHNOLOGIES
Case Number: 12-2513
Filed: November 26, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 24, 2014 Dice Corp. v. Bold Technologies

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2014 Filing 6111945220 OPINION filed : The district court's grant of Bold's motion for summary judgment and its denial of Dice's motion for indicative ruling are AFFIRMED. Decision not for publication. Ralph B. Guy, Jr., Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING) and John M. Rogers, Circuit Judges. [12-2513, 13-1712]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Dice Corp. v. Bold Technologie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: DICE CORP.
Represented By: Craig W. Horn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: BOLD TECHNOLOGIES
Represented By: Peter M. Falkenstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?