Evette Fields v. Fairfield County Board of Deve
EVETTE FIELDS |
FAIRFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES |
12-3005 |
January 4, 2012 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Labor: Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Evette Fields v. Fairfield Cnty Board of Developmental Disabilities |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6111522490 OPINION filed : the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Board is AFFIRMED, decision not for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt, Circuit Judge; David W. McKeague, Circuit Judge and Jane Branstetter Stranch, Authoring Circuit Judge. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Evette Fields v. Fairfield County Board of Deve | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: EVETTE FIELDS | |
Represented By: | Gary A. Reeve |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: FAIRFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES | |
Represented By: | Marc A. Fishel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.