USA v. Karen Anderson-Bagshaw
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: KAREN A. ANDERSON-BAGSHAW, aka Karen Bagshaw
Case Number: 12-3074
Filed: January 23, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 19, 2012 USA v. Karen Anderson-Bagshaw

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6111536026 OPINION filed : AFFIRMED, decision not for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt, Circuit Judge; Karen Nelson Moore, Circuit Judge, Concurring and David W. McKeague, Authoring Circuit Judge.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Karen Anderson-Bagshaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Laura McMullen Ford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: KAREN A. ANDERSON-BAGSHAW, aka Karen Bagshaw
Represented By: Vanessa Faye Malone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?