USA v. Levar Johnson
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| LEVAR JOHNSON |
| 12-3811 |
| June 29, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111790930
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The order the district court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED. Decision for publication. Damon J. Keith (AUTHORING), R. Guy Cole, Jr. (CONCURRING IN PART AND IN THE JUDGMENT), and John M. Rogers (DISSENTING), Circuit Judges. *Pursuant to the opinion correction letter, the opinion attached to this entry has been correctged.--[Edited 08/20/2013 by CL] (Opinion locked to the public)--[Edited 08/21/2013 by MMD]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Levar Johnson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Linda H. Barr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: LEVAR JOHNSON | |
| Represented By: | Dennis G. Terez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
