Xiaofen Liu-Chen v. Eric Holder, Jr.
| XIAOFEN LIU-CHEN |
| ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General |
| 12-4196 |
| October 9, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Xiaofen Liu-Chen v. Eric Holder, Jr. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111684024
OPINION filed : The petition for review is DENIED, decision not for publication. John M. Rogers and Raymond M. Kethledge (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges; Paul D. Borman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Xiaofen Liu-Chen v. Eric Holder, Jr. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: XIAOFEN LIU-CHEN | |
| Represented By: | Peter David Lobel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | Yanal H. Yousef |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
