Christine Marais v. Chase Home Finance LLC
CHRISTINE MARAIS |
CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC |
12-4248 |
October 23, 2012 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other Statutory Actions |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6111893405 PER CURIAM OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The dismissal of the Truth in Lending Act claim is AFFIRMED, the dismissal of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act claims is REVERSED, cand the case is REMANDED. Decision for publication. Ronald Lee Gilman and Richard Allen Griffin, Circuit Judges. *Following argument in this case, Judge White recused herself. The decision is filed by quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 46(d). |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Christine Marais v. Chase Home Finance LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: CHRISTINE MARAIS | |
Represented By: | Troy J. Doucet |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC | |
Represented By: | Daniel C. Gibson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.