USA v. Christopher Mateen
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
CHRISTOPHER J. MATEEN |
12-4481 |
December 10, 2012 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
United States v. Mateen |
USA v. Christopher Mateen |
United States v. Mateen |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6111927761 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : Mateen's sentence is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING) and David W. McKeague (DISSENTING), Circuit Judges; Jeffrey James Helmick, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Christopher Mateen | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Benjamin C. Glassman |
Represented By: | Michael J. Hunter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: CHRISTOPHER J. MATEEN | |
Represented By: | Laura E. Byrum |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.