Karen Auday v. Wet Seal Retail, Inc.
| KAREN AUDAY |
| WET SEAL RETAIL, INC. |
| 12-5057 |
| January 24, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Diversity - Civil Rights Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111476616
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the district court for the purpose of dismissing the case without prejudice or of allowing Auday to amend the complaint to substitute the Trustee as the plaintiff. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Jeffrey S. Sutton (AUTHORING), Richard Allen Griffin, and Helene N. White, Circuit Judges.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Karen Auday v. Wet Seal Retail, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: KAREN AUDAY | |
| Represented By: | Frank P. Pinchak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: WET SEAL RETAIL, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan O. Harris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
