James Luedtke v. David Berkebile
| JAMES D. LUEDTKE |
| DAVID BERKEBILE, Warden |
| 12-5656 |
| June 11, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111560642
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's dismissal of Luedtke's fourth claim is VACATED, the remainder of the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedingss consistent with the opinion of this court. Luedtke's motion for the appointment of counsel [4673857-2] is DENIED. Decision for publication. Jeffrey S. Sutton (AUTHORING) and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judges; Peter C. Economus, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: James Luedtke v. David Berkebile | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: JAMES D. LUEDTKE | |
| Represented By: | James D. Luedtke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: DAVID BERKEBILE, Warden | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
