Curtis McNeil v. Sonoco Products Company
| CURTIS MCNEIL |
| SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY |
| 12-5996 |
| August 24, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Curtis McNeil v. Sonoco Products Company |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111684008
Per Curiam OPINION filed : AFFIRMED, decision not for publication. John M. Rogers and Helene N. White, Circuit Judges and The Honorable Arthur L. Alarcon, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting by designation.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Curtis McNeil v. Sonoco Products Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: CURTIS MCNEIL | |
| Represented By: | Theodore Iver Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Russell W. Jackson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
