USA v. State of Tennessee, et al
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee Cross-Appellant: PEOPLE FIRST OF TENNESSEE and PARENT-GUARDIAN ASSOCIATION OF ARLINGTON DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee: STATE OF TENNESSEE, BILL HASLAM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Tennessee, JAMES M. HENRY, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and MARK EMKES, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration
Case Number: 12-6341
Filed: November 1, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 10, 2015 Summary United States v. Tennessee

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. State of Tennessee, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor - appellee cross-appellant: PEOPLE FIRST OF TENNESSEE
Represented By: Earle J. Schwarz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor - appellee cross-appellant: PARENT-GUARDIAN ASSOCIATION OF ARLINGTON DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER
Represented By: Earle J. Schwarz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant cross-appellee: STATE OF TENNESSEE
Represented By: Adam R.F. Gustafson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant cross-appellee: BILL HASLAM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Tennessee
Represented By: Adam R.F. Gustafson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant cross-appellee: JAMES M. HENRY, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
Represented By: Adam R.F. Gustafson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant cross-appellee: MARK EMKES, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration
Represented By: Adam R.F. Gustafson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?