Roteshia Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Securit
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROTESHIA THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Case Number: 13-1666
Filed: May 21, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Social Security: HIA

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 15, 2014 Roteshia Thomas v. Comm'r of Social Security

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 6111936545 Per Curiam OPINION filed: AFFIRMED, decision not for publication. Richard F. Suhrheinrich; Richard Allen Griffin and Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judges.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Roteshia Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Securit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: ROTESHIA THOMAS
Represented By: John Michael Brissette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Represented By: Judith E. Levy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?