Marilyn Shazor v. Professional Transit Managemen, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARILYN SHAZOR
Defendant - Appellee: PROFESSIONAL TRANSIT MANAGEMENT, LTD and THOMAS P. HOCK
Case Number: 13-3253
Filed: March 5, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 19, 2014 Summary Shazor v. Prof'l Transit Mgmt., Ltd.

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Marilyn Shazor v. Professional Transit Managemen, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: MARILYN SHAZOR
Represented By: Michael L. Cioffi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: PROFESSIONAL TRANSIT MANAGEMENT, LTD
Represented By: Jack Bolden Harrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: THOMAS P. HOCK
Represented By: Jack Bolden Harrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?