USA v. Harry Jone
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: HARRY H. JONES
Case Number: 13-3329
Filed: March 21, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 30, 2014 USA v. Harry Jones

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 6111950571 OPINION filed: The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Decision not for publication. Alice M. Batchelder, Chief Circuit Judge; Richard Allen Griffin (AUTHORING), Circuit Judge; Robert Holmes Bell, U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Harry Jone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Daniel Allen Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: HARRY H. JONES
Represented By: Charles E. McFarland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?