John Hopkins, et al v. Kevin Chartrand
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN HOPKINS and GREGG BOYLES
Defendant - Appellee: KEVIN M. CHARTRAND, Individually and as Geauga County Coroner
Case Number: 13-3964
Filed: August 20, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 20, 2014 John Hopkins v. Kevin Chartrand

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: John Hopkins, et al v. Kevin Chartrand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: JOHN HOPKINS
Represented By: Richard N. Selby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: GREGG BOYLES
Represented By: Richard N. Selby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: KEVIN M. CHARTRAND, Individually and as Geauga County Coroner
Represented By: James A. Budzik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?