Anthony Panzica v. Corrections Corp of America, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTHONY PANZICA
Defendant - Appellee: CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, HARDEMAN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES CORPORATION, HARDEMAN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOE EASTERLING, Warden, In his Official and Individual capacity, as Warden of the Hardeman County Correctional Facility, JOHN AND JANE DOES, Presently unknown employees of the Hardeman County Correctional Facility, in their individual capacities and JOHN AND JANE DOES, Presently unknown employees of the Tennessee Department of Corrections, in their individual capacities
Case Number: 13-6018
Filed: August 6, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 17, 2014 Anthony Panzica v. Corrections Corp. of Am.

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Anthony Panzica v. Corrections Corp of America, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: ANTHONY PANZICA
Represented By: D. Marty Lasley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Represented By: James Irvin Pentecost
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: HARDEMAN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES CORPORATION
Represented By: James Irvin Pentecost
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: HARDEMAN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Represented By: James Irvin Pentecost
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: JOE EASTERLING, Warden, In his Official and Individual capacity, as Warden of the Hardeman County Correctional Facility
Represented By: James Irvin Pentecost
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: JOHN AND JANE DOES, Presently unknown employees of the Hardeman County Correctional Facility, in their individual capacities
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: JOHN AND JANE DOES, Presently unknown employees of the Tennessee Department of Corrections, in their individual capacities
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?