Bruce Ealey v. Daniel Tetirick, et al
BRUCE MARKUS EALEY, named on complaint as Bruce Markus Ealey-El |
DANIEL TETIRICK, Facility Doctor and UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Doctor Medical Provider at Ryan Correctional Facility, Doctor Doe |
14-2540 |
December 5, 2014 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Bruce Ealey v. Daniel Tetirick, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: BRUCE MARKUS EALEY, named on complaint as Bruce Markus Ealey-El | |
Represented By: | Bruce Markus Ealey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: DANIEL TETIRICK, Facility Doctor | |
Represented By: | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Doctor Medical Provider at Ryan Correctional Facility, Doctor Doe | |
Represented By: | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.