Soaring Eagle Casino and Resor v. NLRB
| SOARING EAGLE CASINO AND RESORT, an Enterprise of the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan |
| NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD |
| 14-2558 |
| December 9, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Soaring Eagle Casino and Resor v. NLRB | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner cross-respondent: SOARING EAGLE CASINO AND RESORT, an Enterprise of the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan | |
| Represented By: | William A. Szotkowski |
| Represented By: | Jessica S. Intermill |
| Represented By: | Sean J. Reed |
| Represented By: | Jessica Jean Stomski Seim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent cross-petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD | |
| Represented By: | Linda Dreeben |
| Represented By: | Blair Katherine Simmons |
| Represented By: | Kira D. Vol |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
