Nathan Hice v. David J. Joseph Company
| NATHAN HICE |
| DAVID J. JOSEPH COMPANY |
| 16-3559 |
| May 26, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Family and Medical Leave Act |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Nathan Hice v. David J. Joseph Co. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Nathan Hice v. David J. Joseph Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: NATHAN HICE | |
| Represented By: | Teresa L. Cunningham |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: DAVID J. JOSEPH COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Patricia Anderson Pryor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
