Vincent Niepsuj v. Office Of Administrative Judge, et al
| VINCENT M. NIEPSUJ |
| OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE OF SUMMIT COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS COURT and OFFICE OF CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE OHIO SUPREME COURT |
| 17-3690 |
| June 28, 2017 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Vincent Niepsuj v. Office Of Administrative Judge, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: VINCENT M. NIEPSUJ | |
| Represented By: | Vincent M. Niepsuj |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE OF SUMMIT COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS COURT | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: OFFICE OF CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE OHIO SUPREME COURT | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
