James Payne v. McPherson, et al
| DEPUTY MCPHERSON, DEPUTY WEIR and DEPUTY JOE EDDY |
| JAMES U. PAYNE |
| 19-1104 |
| January 31, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER filed: It is ordered that the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction (late notice of appeal) . Alan E. Norris, Circuit Judge; Jeffrey S. Sutton, Circuit Judge and Deborah L. Cook, Circuit Judge.--[Edited 03/27/2019 by YH] (KSF) [Entered: 03/22/2019 11:56 AM]
|
| Filing 6 CORRESPONDENCE: Copies of district court documents RE #20 and RE #22. by Mr. James U. Payne. (SSS) [Entered: 03/04/2019 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE filed to the show cause for jurisdiction - late noa, [ # 3 ]. Response filed by Party Mr. James U. Payne. Certificate of Service:02/26/2019. (SSS) [Entered: 03/04/2019 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 4 Update fee status change to ifp. District Court Order entered 4/13/2018, RE #4 Grants application to proceed in forma pauperis. (SSS) [Entered: 02/15/2019 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 3 SHOW CAUSE order filed to have Appellant Mr. James U. Payne show cause for possible jurisdictional defect involving the filing of a late notice of appeal. Response due by 03/07/2019 for James U. Payne. (KSF) [Entered: 02/14/2019 07:55 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Sharday Swain (SSS) [Entered: 01/31/2019 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant James U. Payne. Transcript needed: n. (SSS) [Entered: 01/31/2019 11:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
