USA v. David Runyon
| DAVID DEARIES RUNYON |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-1108 |
| February 1, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 04/24/2019; appellee brief due 05/24/2019. (REO) [Entered: 03/15/2019 08:22 AM] |
| Filing 11 Transcript, [6], has been filed in the District Court on 03/14/2019 ; Court Reporter: Ms. Kathleen Sue Thomas ; Actual Number of Pages: 14 ; Actual Number of Volumes: 1 ; [19-1108] (KST) [Entered: 03/14/2019 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 10 Pre-sentence report filed. (MH) [Entered: 03/06/2019 01:07 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTIFICATION: Setting transcript deadline, relating to transcript order, [6] Transcript to be filed in district court by Kathleen Sue Thomas by 03/21/2019. (REO) [Entered: 02/19/2019 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 8 Court Reporter Acknowledgement filed by Ms. Kathleen Sue Thomas, for transcript [6] ; Arrangements for payment were made on 02/19/2019 ; Estimated completion date: 03/19/2019 ; Estimated number of pages: 20 pgs. . [19-1108] (KST) [Entered: 02/19/2019 12:21 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTIFICATION: Setting acknowledgement deadline, relating to transcript order, [6]. Kathleen Sue Thomas's acknowledgement is due 02/19/2019. (REO) [Entered: 02/05/2019 12:22 PM] |
| Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT ordered from Ms. Kathleen Sue Thomas, filed by Mr. Scott Graham for David Dearies Runyon. [6] ; ----- This is to order a transcript of the following proceedings and to certify that satisfactory financial arrangements have been completed ----- Transcript ordered on: 01/25/2019 ; District Court Judge/Magistrate: Paul L. Maloney ; Hearing Dates: January 22, 2019 Sentencing ; Method of Payment: Criminal Justice Act ; Court reporter acknowledgement is due in 14 days. Certificate of Service: 02/05/2019. [19-1108] (SG) [Entered: 02/05/2019 09:19 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant David Dearies Runyon by Scott Graham. Certificate of Service: 02/05/2019. [19-1108] (SG) [Entered: 02/05/2019 09:16 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee USA by Jonathan Roth. Certificate of Service: 02/04/2019. [19-1108] (JR) [Entered: 02/04/2019 10:03 AM] |
| Filing 3 RULING to extend appointment of Mr. Scott Graham for David Dearies Runyon as counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. (REO) [Entered: 02/01/2019 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Ryan Orme (REO) [Entered: 02/01/2019 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant David Dearies Runyon. Transcript needed: y. (REO) [Entered: 02/01/2019 03:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. David Runyon | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: DAVID DEARIES RUNYON | |
| Represented By: | Scott Graham |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Roth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
