Kevin Theriot v. [unknown] Maki, et al
[UNKNOWN] MAKI, OFFICER WHITE, OFFICER HAYOTE, OFFICER PIETI, OFFICER DELENE and OFFICER WILLIAM DELENE |
KEVIN DWAYNE THERIOT |
19-1267 |
March 19, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Prisoner trust account statement filed. (CB) [Entered: 04/03/2019 01:39 PM] |
Filing 9 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Kevin Dwayne Theriot Certificate of Service: 03/24/2019. (CB) [Entered: 04/03/2019 01:39 PM] |
Filing 8 Appellant MOTION filed by Kevin Dwayne Theriot to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 03/24/2019. (CB) [Entered: 04/03/2019 01:38 PM] |
Filing 7 Update fee status change to due. (CB) [Entered: 03/28/2019 08:47 AM] |
Filing 6 Copy of District Court Order filed denying in forma pauperis. (CB) [Entered: 03/28/2019 08:46 AM] |
Filing 5 SHOW CAUSE order filed to have Appellant Kevin Dwayne Theriot show cause for possible jurisdictional defect involving the filing of a late notice of appeal. Response due by 04/11/2019 for Kevin Dwayne Theriot, to hold briefing in abeyance. (MMD) [Entered: 03/21/2019 08:24 AM] |
Filing 4 Defendant not served in district court, complaint dismissed prior to service. (CB) [Entered: 03/19/2019 10:36 AM] |
Filing 3 Update fee status change to due. (CB) [Entered: 03/19/2019 10:34 AM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Cheryl Borkowski (CB) [Entered: 03/19/2019 10:34 AM] |
Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Kevin Theriot. Transcript needed: n. (CB) [Entered: 03/19/2019 10:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.