Kevin Varner v. John Christiansen
| LORI GIDLEY, Warden and JOHN CHRISTIANSEN, Warden |
| KEVIN SCOTT VARNER |
| 19-1511 |
| May 8, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee John Christiansen by John S. Pallas. Certificate of Service: 06/24/2019. [19-1511] (AMC) [Entered: 06/24/2019 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 7 **LOCKED** APPEARANCE filed for Appellee John Christiansen by John S. Pallas. Certificate of Service: 06/24/2019. [19-1511]--[Edited 06/24/2019 by ASM] (AMC) [Entered: 06/24/2019 12:48 PM] |
Filing 4
Copy of District Court Order filed 5/20/2019, R. 62: ORDER transferring Application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs to USCA for the Sixth Circuit. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (DPer) (ASM) [Entered: 05/21/2019 01:22 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Prisoner trust account statement filed. (ASM) [Entered: 05/21/2019 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 5 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Kevin Scott Varner to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 05/06/2019. (ASM) [Entered: 05/21/2019 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 3 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Kevin Scott Varner to grant a certificate of appealability. Certificate of service: 04/30/2019. (ASM) [Entered: 05/14/2019 08:59 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Antoinette Macon (ASM) [Entered: 05/08/2019 09:16 AM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin Scott Varner. Transcript needed: n. (ASM) [Entered: 05/08/2019 09:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
