Marlon ScarberIn re: Marlon Scarber
Petitioner: In re: MARLON SCARBER
Respondent: SHERMAN CAMPBELL
Case Number: 19-1608
Filed: June 3, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2019 Filing 3 The case manager for this case is: Michelle Davis (MMD) [Entered: 06/03/2019 10:47 AM]
June 3, 2019 Filing 2 RULING LETTER SENT directing Movant Marlon Scarber to file a corrected second successive habeas motion. (MMD) [Entered: 06/03/2019 10:42 AM]
June 3, 2019 Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Marlon Scarber. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 05/28/2019. (MMD) [Entered: 06/03/2019 10:40 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Marlon ScarberIn re: Marlon Scarber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SHERMAN CAMPBELL
Represented By: John S. Pallas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: MARLON SCARBER
Represented By: Marlon Scarber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?