Umar Muhammad v. Bonita Hoffner, et al
INSPECTOR HOUGH, JEFF WOODS, A. LONG, BRYAN MORRISON, BONITA J. HOFFNER, MS. MARVIN, R. VALLE, J. ROHRIG, M. STEPHENS, TORRIE STRONG and J. HUTCHINS |
UMAR MUHAMMAD |
19-1805 |
July 23, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 10/30/2019. (KSF) [Entered: 09/17/2019 03:00 PM] |
Filing 9 Copy of District Court Order (RE 27) filed 9/12/19 granting in forma pauperis. (KSF) [Entered: 09/17/2019 02:58 PM] |
Filing 8 Deficiency notice (RE 22) filed 8/20/19. (KSF) [Entered: 08/20/2019 10:15 AM] |
Filing 7 CORRESPONDENCE: Letter sending a corrected copy of the district court docket sheet by Umar Muhammad. (KSF) [Entered: 08/19/2019 02:15 PM] |
Filing 6 Prisoner trust account statement filed. (KSF) [Entered: 08/06/2019 07:57 AM] |
Filing 5 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Umar Muhammad Certificate of Service: 08/01/2019. (KSF) [Entered: 08/06/2019 07:57 AM] |
Filing 4 Appellant MOTION filed by Umar Muhammad to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 08/01/2019. (KSF) [Entered: 08/06/2019 07:56 AM] |
Filing 3 Defendants not served in district court, complaint dismissed prior to service. (KSF) [Entered: 07/23/2019 03:33 PM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Karen Fultz. (KSF) [Entered: 07/23/2019 03:32 PM] |
Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Umar Muhammad. Transcript needed: n. (KSF) [Entered: 07/23/2019 03:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.