Eugene Szymanski v. John Christiansen
EUGENE SZYMANSKI |
JOHN CHRISTIANSEN |
19-1839 |
August 1, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Appellant MOTION filed by Eugene Szymanski to grant a certificate of appealability. Certificate of service: 08/22/2019. (ASM) [Entered: 09/04/2019 08:53 AM] |
Filing 3 Respondent not served in district court, complaint dismissed prior to service. (ASM) [Entered: 08/01/2019 01:33 PM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Antoinette Macon (ASM) [Entered: 08/01/2019 01:32 PM] |
Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied. Notice filed by Appellant Eugene Szymanski. Transcript needed: n. (ASM) [Entered: 08/01/2019 01:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Eugene Szymanski v. John Christiansen | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: EUGENE SZYMANSKI | |
Represented By: | Eugene Szymanski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: JOHN CHRISTIANSEN | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.