In re: Christopher Johnson
| In re: CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON |
| JOSEPH BARRETT |
| 19-1885 |
| August 9, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RULING LETTER SENT directing Movant Christopher Johnson to file a corrected second successive habeas motion. (JC) [Entered: 08/09/2019 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is now: Robin L. Baker (JC) [Entered: 08/09/2019 01:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Christopher Johnson. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 08/02/2019. (JC) [Entered: 08/09/2019 01:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Christopher Johnson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: JOSEPH BARRETT | |
| Represented By: | John S. Pallas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
