Rochelle Daniel v. Goodyear Tire/CBSD, et al
Defendant: GOODYEAR TIRE/CBSD
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROCHELLE DANIEL
Defendant / Appellee: CITIBANK SOUTH DAKOTA, N.A., successor in interest to Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. and CITIBANK, N.A., successor in interest to Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.
Case Number: 19-1937
Filed: August 22, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2019 Filing 7 APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Rochelle Daniel Certificate of Service:10/03/2019. Argument Request: not received. (SSS) [Entered: 10/08/2019 02:37 PM]
September 6, 2019 Filing 6 LETTER SENT to Rochelle Daniel and Ms. Amy Sabbota Gottlieb for Citibank, N.A., regarding amended caption to terminate party CITIBANK SOUTH DAKOTA, N.A., successor in interest to Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. and replace with party CITIBANK, N.A., successor in interest to Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. (SSS) [Entered: 09/06/2019 09:55 AM]
September 5, 2019 Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Ms. Amy Sabbota Gottlieb for Appellee Citibank, N.A. Certificate of Service: 09/05/2019. [19-1937]--[Edited 09/06/2019 by SSS] (ASG) [Entered: 09/05/2019 01:32 PM]
September 5, 2019 Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Citibank, N.A by Amy Sabbota Gottlieb. Certificate of Service: 09/05/2019. [19-1937]--[Edited 09/06/2019 by SSS] (ASG) [Entered: 09/05/2019 01:31 PM]
August 22, 2019 Filing 3 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 10/04/2019; appellee brief due 11/06/2019. (SSS) [Entered: 08/22/2019 09:39 AM]
August 22, 2019 Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Sharday Swain (SSS) [Entered: 08/22/2019 09:38 AM]
August 22, 2019 Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Rochelle Daniel. Transcript needed: n. (SSS) [Entered: 08/22/2019 09:28 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Rochelle Daniel v. Goodyear Tire/CBSD, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ROCHELLE DANIEL
Represented By: Rochelle Daniel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GOODYEAR TIRE/CBSD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITIBANK SOUTH DAKOTA, N.A., successor in interest to Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.
Represented By: Kathryn Jean A. Miller
Represented By: Amy Sabbota Gottlieb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITIBANK, N.A., successor in interest to Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.
Represented By: Amy Sabbota Gottlieb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?