Rochelle Daniel v. Goodyear Tire/CBSD, et al
GOODYEAR TIRE/CBSD |
ROCHELLE DANIEL |
CITIBANK SOUTH DAKOTA, N.A., successor in interest to Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. and CITIBANK, N.A., successor in interest to Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. |
19-1937 |
August 22, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Rochelle Daniel Certificate of Service:10/03/2019. Argument Request: not received. (SSS) [Entered: 10/08/2019 02:37 PM] |
Filing 6 LETTER SENT to Rochelle Daniel and Ms. Amy Sabbota Gottlieb for Citibank, N.A., regarding amended caption to terminate party CITIBANK SOUTH DAKOTA, N.A., successor in interest to Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. and replace with party CITIBANK, N.A., successor in interest to Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. (SSS) [Entered: 09/06/2019 09:55 AM] |
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Ms. Amy Sabbota Gottlieb for Appellee Citibank, N.A. Certificate of Service: 09/05/2019. [19-1937]--[Edited 09/06/2019 by SSS] (ASG) [Entered: 09/05/2019 01:32 PM] |
Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Citibank, N.A by Amy Sabbota Gottlieb. Certificate of Service: 09/05/2019. [19-1937]--[Edited 09/06/2019 by SSS] (ASG) [Entered: 09/05/2019 01:31 PM] |
Filing 3 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 10/04/2019; appellee brief due 11/06/2019. (SSS) [Entered: 08/22/2019 09:39 AM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Sharday Swain (SSS) [Entered: 08/22/2019 09:38 AM] |
Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Rochelle Daniel. Transcript needed: n. (SSS) [Entered: 08/22/2019 09:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.