Nasir Banks v. Sherry Burt
Respondent / Appellee: SHERRY L. BURT
Petitioner / Appellant: NASIR LAMONT BANKS
Case Number: 19-1946
Filed: August 23, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER filed to dismiss as a duplicate appeal of case number 19-1895. 6th Cir. R. 45(a)(8). (KSF) [Entered: 08/27/2019 08:56 AM]
August 23, 2019 Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Karen Fultz. (KSF) [Entered: 08/23/2019 01:46 PM]
August 23, 2019 Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Nasir Lamont Banks. Transcript needed: n. (KSF) [Entered: 08/23/2019 01:43 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Nasir Banks v. Sherry Burt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: SHERRY L. BURT
Represented By: Laura Graves Moody
Represented By: John S. Pallas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: NASIR LAMONT BANKS
Represented By: Nasir Lamont Banks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?