Kenneth Colvin, Jr. v. Connie Horton, et al
DAVE RINK, Chaplain, DAVID M. LEACH, Former MDOC Special Activities Coordinator, JEFFREY WOODS, Warden, Former Warden, D. M. STEWARD, CONNIE HORTON, Warden, K. PELKY, Chaplain, STEVEN ADAMSON, Special Activities Coordinator and JEFFREY WOODS, Warden |
KENNETH COLVIN, JR. |
19-2067 |
September 17, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 11/12/2019. (REO) [Entered: 09/27/2019 04:00 PM] |
Filing 6 4A4 ORDER from district court filed: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 6) of the Courts opinion and judgment dismissing his action for failure to state a claim, construed as a motion to alter or amend judgment under Rule 59(e), is DENIED. Order Filed:09/24/2019 (REO) [Entered: 09/27/2019 03:55 PM] |
Filing 5 Copy of District Court Order filed granting in forma pauperis on appeal and ordering payment of the full filing fee in installments. (REO) [Entered: 09/24/2019 01:46 PM] |
Filing 4 4a4 Notice filed. Case held in abeyance pending a ruling on the motion for reconsideration filed in the district court on 9/5/2019 RE #6. (REO) [Entered: 09/18/2019 08:25 AM] |
Filing 3 Defendant not served in district court, complaint dismissed prior to service. (REO) [Entered: 09/17/2019 04:29 PM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Ryan Orme (REO) [Entered: 09/17/2019 04:27 PM] |
Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Kenneth Colvin, Jr.. Transcript needed: n. (REO) [Entered: 09/17/2019 04:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.