Sheila Armstrong v. MI Bureau of Serv for Blind, et al
JOHN KING, JR., JAMES HULL, EDWARD ROGERS, II, MICHIGAN BUREAU OF SERVICES FOR BLIND PERSONS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, TAMELA MEEK and BETSY DEVOS, Secretary of Education |
SHEILA ARMSTRONG |
19-2179 |
October 11, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Armstrong v. Michigan Bureau of Services for Blind Persons |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 MEDIATOR LETTER SENT granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 15 ] filed by Mr. William Dane Carey., resetting briefing schedule: appellant brief now due 01/24/2020. appellee brief now due 02/24/2020. (LMR) [Entered: 11/15/2019 12:51 PM] |
Filing 15 LOCKED-MOTION filed by Mr. William Dane Carey for Sheila Armstrong to extend time to file brief. LOCKED AS PER MEDIATION OFFICE. Certificate of Service: 11/15/2019. [19-2179]--[Edited 11/15/2019 by CAW] (WDC) [Entered: 11/15/2019 11:10 AM] |
Filing 14 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Betsy Devos and U.S. Department of Education by Michael L. Shiparski. Certificate of Service: 10/28/2019. [19-2179] (MLS) [Entered: 10/28/2019 02:43 PM] |
Filing 13 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee U.S. Department of Education by Michael L. Shiparski. Certificate of Service: 10/28/2019. [19-2179] (MLS) [Entered: 10/28/2019 09:53 AM] |
Filing 12 *LOCKED, TO BE REFILED WITH CORRECTIONS AS REQUESTED** APPEARANCE filed for Appellee U.S. Department of Education by Michael L. Shiparski. Certificate of Service: 10/25/2019. [19-2179]--[Edited 10/28/2019 by CB] (MLS) [Entered: 10/25/2019 04:27 PM] |
Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. Christopher W. Braverman for Appellees James Hull, Tamela Meek, Michigan Bureau of Services for Blind Persons and Edward Rogers, II Certificate of Service: 10/22/2019. [19-2179] (CWB) [Entered: 10/22/2019 11:32 AM] |
Filing 10 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees James Hull, Tamela Meek, Michigan Bureau of Services for Blind Persons and Edward Rogers, II by Christopher W. Braverman. Certificate of Service: 10/22/2019. [19-2179] (CWB) [Entered: 10/22/2019 11:30 AM] |
Filing 9 MEDIATOR INITIATED CALL: A Telephone Mediation conference has been scheduled for 11/05/2019 at 9:30 AM (ET) with Robert Kaiser. [Please open notice for important details and deadlines.] (LMR) [Entered: 10/15/2019 04:21 PM] |
Filing 8 Mediation Office is involved in this appeal. (LMR) [Entered: 10/15/2019 04:07 PM] |
Filing 7 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 11/25/2019;. appellee brief due 12/24/2019; (CB) [Entered: 10/15/2019 01:25 PM] |
Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT ORDER filed - transcript is unnecessary for appeal purposes. Filed by Mr. William Dane Carey for Sheila Armstrong. Certificate of Service: 10/15/2019. [19-2179] (WDC) [Entered: 10/15/2019 12:04 PM] |
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. William Dane Carey for Appellant Sheila Armstrong Certificate of Service: 10/15/2019. [19-2179] (WDC) [Entered: 10/15/2019 11:56 AM] |
Filing 4 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. William Dane Carey for Appellant Sheila Armstrong. Certificate of Service:10/15/2019. [19-2179] (WDC) [Entered: 10/15/2019 11:55 AM] |
Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Sheila Armstrong by W. Dane Carey. Certificate of Service: 10/15/2019. [19-2179] (WDC) [Entered: 10/15/2019 11:54 AM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Cheryl Borkowski (CB) [Entered: 10/11/2019 02:19 PM] |
Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Sheila Armstrong. Transcript needed: y. (CB) [Entered: 10/11/2019 02:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.