Romell Broom v. Tim Shoop
Respondent / Appellee: CHARLOTTE JENKINS and TIM SHOOP, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant: ROMELL BROOM
Case Number: 19-3356
Filed: April 22, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 23, 2020 Summary Broom v. Shoop

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2019 Filing 13 RULING (see order filed 6-10-19 #12) to extend appointment of Ms. S. Adele Shank for Romell Broom and Mr. Timothy F. Sweeney for Romell Broom as counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. (PJE) [Entered: 06/10/2019 12:19 PM]
June 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER filed GRANTING motion to continue appointment of counsel [ # 7 ] filed by Mr. Timothy F. Sweeney and S. Adele Shank. Entered by order of the court. (PJE) [Entered: 06/10/2019 12:09 PM]
May 21, 2019 Filing 8 NOTIFICATION filed by Mr. Timothy F. Sweeney for Romell Broom regarding APPELLANT'S INTENT TO FILE, WITHIN 60 DAYS, ANY APPLICATION HE MIGHT MAKE IN THIS COURT FOR EXPANSION OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. Certificate of Service: 05/21/2019. [19-3356] (TFS) [Entered: 05/21/2019 09:19 AM]
May 17, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION filed by Timothy F. Sweeney and S. Adele Shank for Romell Broom to continue appointment of counsel of CJA Counsel Sweeney and Shank for Appellant Romell Broom. Certificate of Service: 05/17/2019. [19-3356]--[Edited 05/20/2019 by PJE] (TFS) [Entered: 05/17/2019 03:34 PM]
May 6, 2019 Filing 6 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Romell Broom by S. Adele Shank. Certificate of Service: 05/06/2019. [19-3356] (SAS) [Entered: 05/06/2019 10:27 PM]
May 6, 2019 Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Romell Broom by Timothy F. Sweeney. Certificate of Service: 05/06/2019. [19-3356] (TFS) [Entered: 05/06/2019 08:13 PM]
May 6, 2019 Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Tim Shoop by Charles L. Wille. Certificate of Service: 05/06/2019. [19-3356] (CLW) [Entered: 05/06/2019 05:29 PM]
April 29, 2019 Filing 3 LETTER SENT to parties regarding corrected caption of this case. (PJE) [Entered: 04/29/2019 08:04 AM]
April 22, 2019 Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Patricia J. Elder (PJE) [Entered: 04/22/2019 07:49 AM]
April 22, 2019 Filing 1 Death Penalty Case Docketed with certificate of appealability granted in part and denied in part. Notice filed by Appellant Romell Broom. Transcript needed: n. (PJE) [Entered: 04/22/2019 07:44 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Romell Broom v. Tim Shoop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: CHARLOTTE JENKINS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: TIM SHOOP, Warden
Represented By: Charles L. Wille
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: ROMELL BROOM
Represented By: Timothy F. Sweeney
Represented By: S. Adele Shank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?