Jodi Fleming v. Ohio Bell Telephone Company, et al
| CEO RANDALL STEPHENSON, JAMES TENCH, Senior Manager, WILLIAM A. BLASE, JR., Vice President of Human Resources, JANICE KING, Director of Human Resources, RICK PLANT, Labor Relations, SANDRA MORENO, Senior EEO Consultant and OHIO BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, originally named as AT&T Corp. |
| JODI D. FLEMING |
| 19-3567 |
| June 14, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Ms. Amy Ryder Wentz for Appellees William A. Blase, Jr., Janice King, Sandra Moreno, Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Rick Plant, Randall Stephenson and James Tench Certificate of Service: 07/22/2019. [19-3567] (ARW) [Entered: 07/22/2019 10:58 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees William A. Blase, Jr., Janice King, Sandra Moreno, Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Rick Plant, Randall Stephenson and James Tench by Amy Ryder Wentz. Certificate of Service: 07/22/2019. [19-3567] (ARW) [Entered: 07/22/2019 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 4 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Ms. Jodi D. Fleming (CAM) [Entered: 07/19/2019 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 3 Appellant MOTION filed by Ms. Jodi D. Fleming to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: none. (CAM) [Entered: 07/19/2019 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: C. Anthony Milton (CAM) [Entered: 06/14/2019 10:25 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Ms. Jodi D. Fleming. Transcript needed: n. (CAM) [Entered: 06/14/2019 10:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
